28 May 2013

Exclusive - Woolwich suspect tortured "at behest of British intelligence", Parliamentary Intelligence Committee is told: Police's arrest of witness claiming Woolwich attacker was radicalised by torture, sexual abuse and harassment was "ordered by MI5"

A letter to the UK Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee by a childhood friend of one of the Woolwich attackers claims that the suspect was subjected to "systematic torture and sexual abuse" by Kenyan troops on behalf of Britain's security services. 

The letter - exclusive excerpts of which are quoted below - is authored by Ibrahim Hassan, otherwise known as "Abu Nusaybah", who was interviewed by Richard Watson on BBC Newsnight claiming that MI5 had been harassing Woolwich suspect Michael "Mujahid" Adebolajo to join the agency as an informant six months ago. Hassan was arrested by Metropolitan Police under the Terrorism Act 2000 immediately after his BBC interview, and is currently in custody at Southwark Police Station.

A copy of this letter was obtained by this author today, photographs of which are posted at the end of this report, which also contains an exclusive interview with Ibrahim Hassan's lawyer with previously unknown details of Adebolajo's alleged ordeal.

Addressed to chairman of the committee Sir Malcolm Rifkind, and prepared with the assistance of his solicitors, Hassan's letter insists on his innocence of involvement in terrorism activities, and his condemnation of Adebolajo's "shocking acts." Arguing that it is in "the public interest that everything that can be done to prevent such atrocities in the future should be the government's top priority", Hassan says that he believes "two fundamental factors" explain this behaviour:

"... the first factor was the systematic torture and sexual abuse he was subjected to by Kenyan troops which he believed was at the behest of British intelligence. Michael was told by his captors that this action by them was at the behest of UK authorities. He could not forget or forgive them for this connivance in this brutal treatment of him, when all he was trying to do was build a new life for himself outside of the UK."

After his return to the UK, Hassan writes that Adebolajo "informed me that he was subject to further harassment and intimidation by the security services in order to pressure him into working for them as an agent." The letter implores the committee "to investigate any connection between the UK and Kenyan authorities in the mistreatment of Michael Adebolajo whilst in their hands. I am witness to the fact that the Michael I knew ceased to exist after his treatment in Kenya."

The letter also claims that counter terrorism police officers did not deny that the arrest was ordered by MI5. It points out that: 

"at a hearing video link on the 26th May 2013 with Westminster Magistrates Court where the police sought permission from the court to extend my time in custody, my barrister asked if my arrest was ordered by the intelligence services [and] the police refused to deny this possibility." 

Hassan adds that he believes his arrest "was ordered by the intelligence services because I made this information public."

Adebolajo was one of seven men arrested by Kenyan authorities during a trip to the country in November 2010. Kenyan police at the time accused the men of travelling to Somalia to join the al-Qaeda affiliated terrorist group al-Shabaab. His family and friends claimed that he had been detained without charge and tortured before his return to Britain.

The claims have been corroborated by a London-based human rights organisation, Cage Prisoners. Chairman of the group, Moazzem Begg, said the day after Hassan's arrest:

"Is it a coincidence that Abu Nusaybah was arrested yesterday at the BBC studios right after he gave an interview which described the MI5 harassment and torture in Kenya - which British intelligence knew about and quite possibly was complicit in - of Michael Adebolajo?"

Begg confirmed that Adebolajo had "approached us around the time about it and we referred him to lawyers as a result."

Now Begg's confirmation is supported with further details by Ibrahim Hassan's lawyer, Mohammed Akunjee of Soni & Kaur Solicitors in an exclusive interview with this author.

Akunjee said that his client told him that Michael Adebolajo had been tortured in Kenya under the orders of Britain's security services. He added that this key claim put forth by Hassan and recorded during his BBC Newsnight interview was inexplicably not aired on the first programme. Instead, Newsnight waited until the release of Hassan's letter to air the recording today, 28th May.

Akunjee said that, "Abu Nusayba told me that 6 months ago Michael Adebolajo had turned up at his house distraught and explained to him that he was being harassed and hounded by MI5 officers.

"They had been good friends for many years - since before each of them had converted to Islam - which is why Adebolajo confided in him. Adebolajo told him that during his trip to Kenya to undertake an Islamic studies course, he had been arrested by Kenyan authorities on the pretext that he was trying to collaborate with al Shabaab.

"He said that after being detained in a holding cell for hours, a number of Kenyan security officers turned up at his cell and beat him severely all over to interrogate him although he protested his innocence.

"When Adebolajo demanded to have contact with the British embassy, the Kenyan officers laughed and told him, 'Who do you think asked us to do this to you?'

"One of the officers then stripped him and grabbed his penis. He told him, 'If you don't talk, I'm going to fuck you.' As Adebolajo was innocent, there was nothing he could say. According to my client, Adebolajo said to him that the Kenyan officers then proceeded to do 'unimaginable things to him which he couldn't bear talking about'."

"Eventually, Adebolajo was put on trial in a Kenyan court, but the case collapsed due to lack of evidence. Back in the UK, his family lobbied the Foreign Office and eventually the public pressure forced the British authorities into action and the Kenyan authorities were compelled to free him."

However, according to Akunjee, as soon as Adebolajo arrived back in the UK, "he was greeted by MI5 officers who interrogated him at the airport."

Although Hassan is a former member of the banned extremist group Al Muhajiroun, Akunjee points out that it is because his client shared similar experiences to his friend Michael Adebolajo that the latter felt comfortable with confiding in him.

Akunjee also said: 

"I'm a criminal defence lawyer and have to assess the cogency of evidence and information on a daily basis. I can say that Ibrahim Hassan's testimony on this issue appears plausible - he had no motive to lie, in fact, he knew that coming on record with this information could backfire for him due to his background. I think his testimony is credible."

On Newsnight's earlier decision to not air allegations on the crucial link between the security services and Adebolajo's torture, Akunjee said: 

"The specific allegations that my client related suggesting that the UK security services had authorised Kenyan security officers to torture him on behalf of British intelligence was not broadcast by Newsnight, even though it was part of the recorded interview." 

Despite Newsnight's broadcast of that excerpt today, questions remain as to what prompted the editors to avoid doing so earlier.

Akunjee further raised questions as to why British police chose to arrest Ibrahim Hassan under the Terrorism Act after the Newsnight interview, rather than beforehand.

"They had ample opportunity to arrest him days before if they believed he had some connection to the Woolwich attack. My client is concerned that the authorities didn't want this damning testimony to be broadcast, and when it was, to ensure that further revelations would not be publicly released. My client believes he is being punished not for terrorism, but for airing unsavoury and embarrassing allegations about the security services."

Dr. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is an investigative journalist and international security expert who writes for The Guardian at his Earth Insight blog. He is the author of The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry (2006). His work was used by the Coroner's Inquiry into 7/7 and the 9/11 Commission.



  2. Replies
    1. If you think this is crap you better start thinking long and hard, my friend!

  3. It certainly wouldnt surprise me if mi6 ordered his torture, may be even gave him the choice of doing this act of violence or be killed and his family too. They want a divided society, makes it easier to take away our freedoms, and justify future acts of terror against foreign countries.

    The Woolwich murder is incredibly suspicious and has all the hallmarks of a psy-op on the British public - the photographs have been photo-shopped to add the fake blood to the hands - compare the original broadcast with the one shown later. There is also signs of haloing on the hands of the accused if you look closely indicating its been digitally altered. Its utterly ridiculous to think the murderer would be allowed to broadcast his message, just after doing a murder, unless its for propaganda purposes for the government. How did anyone know it was a soldier so quick - just because he was wearing a t-shirt? The blood splatter in the photos is not consistent at all with a beheading. One of the eyewitnesses said they were cradling the victims neck, presumably with a head attached. The woman who is so prominent on the news supposedly an eyewitness comes across like an actress, grandfather worked for mi5. The soldiers family photo has also been doctored too, it just looks completely wrong. The whole thing stinks - designed to stir up anti - Muslim hatred by the government. Within 48 hours, MPs are trying to ressurect the snoopers charter turning this country into a police state.

    1. Seriously??? I mean...SERIOUSLY???!!! Suggest you re-enter Planet Earth's atmosphere & join the real world.
      I'd not be surprised to learn you wear a tin foil hat everywhere you go to stop the powers that be from reading your thoughts!

  4. i said it from the moment i seen it... it stinks of mk utra type behaviour...

  5. this is so true, it stinks of the mk ultra sadist bastards that are running us

  6. How do you explain the fact that the Woolwich terror suspect Michael Adebolajo was best friends with Lance Corporal Kirk Redpath who was killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq in 2007 and attended his funeral, where he was consoled by family friends?

    This is in the same year where Michael was seen in a photo standing next to MI5 asset Anjem Chaudrey and his radical group.

    So we have an individual who is part of a group that openly taunts, harrass and insult dead returning soldiers (Wooten Basset) and yet he chooses to cry over the loss of his best friend killed in action. Split personality or double-agent?

  7. If this was written by a firm of solicitors, why is UK written as "Uk" and "radicalization" the American spelling used instead of radicalisation the British spelling? I think he needs a new solicitor or this is fake.

  8. I've been on the floor in hysterics reading the letter & some of the responses.....As the above comment stated, the spelling alone gives it away.
    What's next excuse?

  9. This is a fake case and prompters of this case are the followers of 'the religion of pieces'. This case is to be foisted on the British Govt. to falsely show that the butcher of Woolwich was a 'victim' (oh how they love to be victimized)and his behaviour (including the savage murder) was an act of retaliation and hence was justified. 'Religion of pieces' justifies its violence by claiming to be an eternal victim of people, nations, philisophies conspiracies and other religions. Nothing the adherents of this religion do, is to be blamed on them but rather on others who are victimizing these 'peaceful' peoples, after all it is a religion of peace. With this ploy they 1. Divert the focus from the main issue (the Woolwich murder) to a non connected issue that is the so called 'occupation' of 'muslim' lands. 2. Gain misplaced sympathies of the idiotic left, assorted liberals, progressives and PC idiot media. 3. Failure of multikulti blamed squarely on the British Govt and peoples for 'not doing more' to make multikulti work. 4.Force British Govt. and peoples to give them more concessions and entitlements as a recompense for the 'wrongs' done previously. 5. Isolate each such incident as an anomaly withing the fabric of 'peaceful religion' as an act of 'crime of passion' rather than a pre-meditated act of terror aimed to 'strike fear in the heart of the enemy'.6. Confuse the public at large- to the point when the public does not know what to believe in and supports any stupid decision taken by the govt. which usually is further concessions and appeasement. There are many more ways in which these falsification of facts are propagated by various channels- this one included to further the creeping of parasitic sharia into the hosts socio legal system. I should know I am an apostate.


Blog Archive